Sunday, November 8, 2009

Among the Hidden #3

Some of you still need to be more careful about punctuation and capitalization. Also, be complete with your answers to the questions. In most cases, these questions require a short paragraph to give a complete answer!

1. Explain why the government made pets illegal. Also, tell why this could have made pets extinct if not for the Barons.

2. Describe how you feel about the Population Law. How is it a good idea? What are the problems with it? Would you be effected by the law if it were in effect in the United States? How?

44 comments:

  1. 1. So food won't run out.

    2. I don't like the Population Law.
    So every parent who dies has a someone can take their place.
    There are to many people who could have 3 children so they have got to hid.
    I woundn't be effected by the Population Law.
    I was the first child born.

    ReplyDelete
  2. 1.They made pets illegal so humans would not run out of food.

    2.I do not like the Population Law because alot of people would die from hunger or execution.

    If someone can't make it and they die, there will be someone else to take their place by becoming the head of the family.

    A bunch of kids will have to take food so the third child will not have food. They will run out of food if they don't have enough food.

    No, I would not likely be affected nor would my brother. My whole family is safe.
    My mom is the second child and my dad is the first child.

    ReplyDelete
  3. 1.Becouse they think they will eat to much food.
    2.I think they are unnesacary.

    Wish I new.

    Every thing.

    Yes.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Harrison famous boyNovember 9, 2009 at 2:53 PM

    1. So they don't run out of food on animals.

    2. The population law stinks. You can learn to be responsible and they are fun to play with. You have to feed them every 2 days. Yes. I would not have my bird anymore.

    ReplyDelete
  5. #1 I like that the government made pets illeagell because they were afrid that they would run out of food.The Barons would just buy them and not care about what th government thinks.
    #2 I think that it is a stupud law to have.But it is a kind of good idea for food and for parents.If the United States had it I would not have both of my step brothers.

    ReplyDelete
  6. 1. I think they made pets illegal because they were scared that the food supply would run out because of pets eating too and it would be to much.


    2.No. I don't like it at all. I think the population law is not fair to the third children!

    It's not a good idea!!!

    It's just not fair!!

    No I would actully not be affected by the law. But my dad's whole side of the family would! OH NO!!!

    ReplyDelete
  7. 1.They made pets illigel so they wouldnt run out of food.

    2.The law is not fair to the third child

    ReplyDelete
  8. 1.You would be spending more money on pets and not on taxes.nobody would be there to help or take care of the pets.
    2.The law stink!!It is a good idea for food but not good for the shadow children because of the hidding thing some don't even have food!!I would not be afected because i'm a only child.

    ReplyDelete
  9. 1. Pets go along with the population law. The government thinks people will go starving.
    2. I think it is very unfair.

    The problems are that so many kids have to hide all day and all night, then when they get older they have to take on a fake identification.

    I would be affected by the population law. I'm so glad its not in the united states!

    ReplyDelete
  10. 1. THE PETS WERE EATING FOOD BUT THE BARONS LIKED THEM SO THEY BROKE THERE OWN LAW

    2. I REALLY DONT LIKE IT WELL IT SOPED SO MANY LIVES FROM HAPPENING IT WAS A HORID LAW. IF IT WAS STILL A LAW I WOUD ETHER NOT BE HERE OR BE IN HIDDING

    ReplyDelete
  11. 1.The pets eat a lot of food so the Goverment is worried that people will starve.

    2.I don't like the population law beacuse it says that people have to do this and have to do that they should let people make their own decisions.
    Even though I don't like the law in some ways it was a good idea.Its not a good idea just to let people starve,and if theres so many people and not enough food then it be almost a war to get food!
    But there are a lot of ways it's not a good idea like I said earlier they should let people decide how many kids they want. And as you see from Jen theres plenty of food.
    If there was a Population Law in the U.S. I would not be affected beacuse I am a second child.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Sorry I just realized how long that comment was.

    ReplyDelete
  13. 1.So that the food would not run out.
    2. Because the (barons) took care of them even when it was illegal.
    3.I don't like the population law.It does not make families all die from no food.It is not a good idea because it dose not. let kids have freedoms like they want to have.
    4.No because I'm an only child

    ReplyDelete
  14. 1. The government made pets illegal because they consumed too much food. The Barons took care of the animals even though they weren't supposed to.

    2. I think the Population Law is unfair. It is only a good idea in its attempt to make sure all people have enough to eat. It is bad because the shadow children can't live their life the way they want to and don't feel valued. I would not be effected by the law because I am a second child. My Mom and Dad would have been ok also.

    ReplyDelete
  15. 1.The government thaut it it was a wast of food the Barons broke the law by having pets.
    2.I think it is a terrible law I would not be alive beacause my dad is a fifth.

    ReplyDelete
  16. 1.So they won't run out of food

    2.a.I think it isn't fair because some people will wat alot of kids.
    b.They will have more food for everyone.
    c.No I won't be effected by because I am a second child.

    ReplyDelete
  17. 1.The reason why pets are illegal because the goverment is afraid they will run out of food.They broke the law by keeping animals as pets.2 I think the Population Law is rediculous.What I think the problem is that everyone deservers a chance to live.I wouldn't be affected because I'm the oldest in my family

    ReplyDelete
  18. 1.So humans would not run out of food.
    2.I do not like the population law and it would not effect me you would have to kill the third child if they were born in a hospital.

    ReplyDelete
  19. 1.So food would not be wasted on pets.Since a lot of barons work for the goverment they can have pets.
    2.I hate the population law.So the population will go down.No. I am the first child

    ReplyDelete
  20. 1. So the food would not be wasted on pets.

    2. Its not fair at all! So many kids have to hide! Some cant even go outside!
    It might be a good idea but just for the food reasons.But like Jen said they have plenty of food!
    I would not be affected be the law. But my little brother would have to hide!I might like that. Just kidding!

    ReplyDelete
  21. 1. They did this so that people won't run out of food. They could be extinct because no one would have them.


    2. I don't like the law. The only reason I think it is a good law is so that the people will have enough food. The law is not good because no one should have to hide. It's very unfair. I wouldn't be affected by the law. I'm the second child.

    ReplyDelete
  22. 1. The government made pets illegal because without pets, humans would have more food. If nobody had pets they would all die off.
    2. I think the Population Law is scary and unfair. I don't think its a good idea. The problems with it are that all children are supposed to be a gift from God. If you have to hide your kid[s], then how can you be showing that they are a gift from God. Yes, I would be affected by the law. I am a third child. Children would not feel good about themselves.

    ReplyDelete
  23. 1.They thought it was a waste of food.
    2.a.I think the pop. law is aful I don't see how it could be a good idea.
    b.They murder people to have more food!
    c.No, beacuse I'm not athird cild but my brother would be elgle.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Because they thought that they would run out of food if there were pets. Because they would not have any were to live and they would starve. I think that it is stupid. It is not a good idea. You should give people freedom to live espescialy for that reason. It would not effect me, because I am not a third child.

    ReplyDelete
  25. 1. The goverment made pets illegal because thay thought is was a waist of food. The reason why animals could get extinct because the animals would probibly starve.
    2.I don`t like the populaition law at all. The only good thing about it is that their would be more money for every family because their would be less taxes to pay. one of the problems would be the goverment wouldn`t as much money from taxes as they would with more kids. The law would not effect me but it would effect my brother.

    ReplyDelete
  26. 1.I think the government made pets illegal so they wouldn't run out of
    food.

    2.L thonk the population law is wrong because a lot of parents want more than two children. It is a good idea because poeple wont starve. I would not be alive if we had the population law.

    ReplyDelete
  27. 1. So the people woudn't run out of food. Because they broke the law and had pets

    2. I hate it. It is a good idea because they wouldn't have to make as much food. The problems are I think it is wrong to tell people how many kids to have. No I wouldnt be effected by it. I was the scond child

    ReplyDelete
  28. 1. They made pets illigal because they took some of our food. Barons had secret pets and kept them alive
    2. I don't like the law. I think its really unfair.

    ReplyDelete
  29. 1.Because they would starve
    2.I dont like it one bit

    ReplyDelete
  30. 1.Pets were illigal because they would eat our food.bareonhad some sercrets pets 2.I think that is just unfair.

    ReplyDelete
  31. 1.Because they would eat some of the food, because no one would have pets.
    2.Bad, less people more food; no.

    ReplyDelete
  32. 1. They thought that pets would take up some of their food, and we would have to eat less. Barons have more food than people like Luke, so the pets the barons have wouldn't take up as much food because the barons have plenty.

    2.I would feel traped if I was a third child when the population law was going on. The population law isn't a good idea, but if I was part of the government making this law I would think it would be a pretty good idea, because you wouldn't run out of food. One of the problems with the population law is you would loose so much population of people. Yes I would, because if I was a third child and my mom hid me I would feel like a bird in a cage.

    ReplyDelete
  33. 1.I think they thought that pets would consum a large piece of food that should be given to the humans and humans would run out of food. The Barons broke the law and cept pets ,wich cept the animals from exstintion.

    2.I belive it is a horrible law that dinies people their rights but it would help the contries money.
    The population law would not effect me at all.

    ReplyDelete
  34. 1. They made pets illegal because they would take up so much food. Barons have more food than people like Luke,the pets and the barons have wouldn't take up as much food because the barons have plenty.

    2. I would feel lonely and trapped if I were Luke. I don't like the population law because you could have enough children as you want. I wouldn't be effected because I'm the only cjild.

    ReplyDelete
  35. 1.Because they would eat some of the food, nobody would have any pets.
    2.I feel that it's not the worst law. I just think that they shouldn't kill the 3rd child. i would be effected by it if I was a 3rd child because I have the right to live.

    ReplyDelete
  36. 1.So food wont run out, because pets would never be alive.
    2.I think the population law is a bad idea because everybody should live in the world and no third children would die .and i would not be efected because Im a second child.

    ReplyDelete
  37. 1.Because pets would eat more food.
    2.I do not like it,because my mom would not be here.

    ReplyDelete
  38. 1.The goverment made pets illegal because in the story the U.S. was having a food shortage.Also, if Barons did not have pets they could become extinct because all of the pets would not survive in the wild.

    2.The population law is a bad idea because after anyone who was born before the law died there would be a small population.Also, I would not be affected by the population law because I am a first child.

    ReplyDelete
  39. 1. The government made pets illegal because the government's food supply was running low. The broke the laws by having pets so it kept the animals alive.

    2. I wouldn't like the Population Law because it's unfair.It treats third children like they don't exist.It is a good idea because if people had too many kids,the food would run out. There are a lot of problems with it. You should be able to have as many children as you want. Also, I would not be efected by the law because I am a first child.

    ReplyDelete
  40. 1. They made pets illegal because they eat food and they didn't want to run out of food. The Barons had a dog in their home.
    2.I do not like the Population Law. There is nothing good about it. Everything about it is a problem.
    I am the third child in my family and I wouldn't be here if we had that law.

    ReplyDelete
  41. 1.They didn't want to run out of food.

    2.I don't think the population law was a good choice because there is not as many people

    ReplyDelete
  42. 1.Because of food purpose and to many pets running around
    2.It was because they were scraded they would run out of food.I think it was a ok law because they were wuried about food so they really just wonted tohelp the citezens

    ReplyDelete
  43. 1. I think the govenremt mand that law becaouse the town was so small they did not have any mour room for pets in the word and they were going to run out of food for people anf for pets.

    2.I dont like the poulption law at all because it is not fair that some people have to hide so they can live and be free from harm. The rromble with the poulption law is that people cant be free and they have to hide in the basemant till the law is over.i woulkd be very mad at the law becouse I cant be free and vist all my friends and family.I think that is was smart for Luke to get the fake ID so he really can be free from the goverment and the poulption police and the law.I sorta think it was smart for Luke to get out of the town to and to be free!

    ReplyDelete
  44. 1.So they would have enough food.And nobody would have pets.
    2.I think it is wrong.I think it is wrong because women should be able to have as many kids as they want.I would not be effected but my sister would.

    ReplyDelete